Skip to content
Open Observer

The Iconic Puzzle Game Didn't Succeed at This Gaming Ceremony — A New Category Might Solve This

Whenever a significant prize-giving event nears, one notices an outcry to include fresh award types to recognize underappreciated efforts and fill the passions of fans with niche passions.

Another commentator made the case for a horror game category. That would be fantastic. So would tabletop games, this being a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward just as with other blinkered fanatics, there's a strong justification backing this proposal stands as crucial and important of all. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create a classification for brain-teasing titles.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that film award organizations steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents a necessary evil for the industry of gaming, which are so diverse they barely qualify a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards presently include genre categories for Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these six categories effectively encompass a lot of ground, and you can find room for most games within them.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. No appropriate category exists for their placement. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, all very different: the architectural riddles from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. What category would fit them between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games launched regularly that have no home during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested Indie races.

  • One classic puzzle game got overlooked in any category during that awards season
  • A different innovative game received no nominations during that ceremony
  • A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment that year
  • Limited numbers of puzzle games managed to sneak into niche award types

Significance of Puzzle Games

Commonly they're small games, but the art of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games rank among most engaged experiences globally and have been for many years.

The famous puzzle experience competes with well-known building titles competing to become most purchased experience; it additionally competes as greatest title ever. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and they are in conversation with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. You could fill multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

Restating the point, these are games that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers are working at the demanding boundary of video game design, developing some of essential manifestations of gaming itself. Just like film action specialists, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay generations.

Written by

Carolyn Collins

Maya Chen is a tech journalist and AI researcher with a passion for demystifying complex technologies and exploring their societal impacts.

Open Observer

Type to search articles.